Harsh truths and bad conferences (Part 2) – Conference socialising and loneliness

Welcome to the second part of my series of blog posts about the problems with the standard academic conference format. For part 1 about conference presentations see here and also part 3 about poster sessions and part 4 about value for money. One thing everyone seems to say about conferences is that they are a great chance to network. I disagree, and this second post in the series is about why.

The typical academic conference has only one social event

The conference dinner is usually the only social gathering in the whole schedule. I’ve never really understood this. The purpose of conferences is to bring people with similar interests to meet up, mingle and foster community, but there aren’t many opportunities to actually do this. This is compounded by the fact that with what little social time there is, most attendees will be catching up with people they know.

If you’ve ever been unfortunate enough to go to a conference alone then you know how isolating it can be at the coffee break or lunch when everyone turns back in to their small circle of friends. It would be great if there was a way to meet people in the same boat, which leads on to my next point:

Meeting others with similar interests is almost impossible

Ignoring general socialising for the moment, conferences in your field are a rare meeting of people with similarly aligned research to yourself, but actually finding other researchers with similar work to yourself (especially if, like the majority of attendees, they aren’t giving a talk) is very hard.

Dinners are usually the only social event of academic conferences

Dinners are usually the only social event of most academic conferences

The only natural route is through poster sessions, which have their own problems deserving of their own post, but this relies on the slim chance the researcher in question is actually standing at their poster. Concerning the other problems with poster sessions, I think this short piece by Annika Coughlin, titled Conference posters: For lonely people to pretend to read at tea breaks?” really hits the nail on the head.

While the points raised here are critical of conferences directly there is a more serious (and until recently, taboo) subject that these social problems link to:

Loneliness and isolation are common in academia

Thankfully this problem is getting more awareness now, but it’s still a massive issue for a lot of PhD students. It would be naive to suggest that these deep problems could be solved by a couple of social events at the next conference, but I think the fact there is almost no social aspect to many conferences is a symptom, going hand-in-hand with how common loneliness and the feeling of isolation is in academia.

If you’ve had any bad conference experiences or ideas on how this could be improved, please comment below or send me a tweet @Owl_Meat


6 thoughts on “Harsh truths and bad conferences (Part 2) – Conference socialising and loneliness

  1. I agree that conferences should reserve more time without presentations. A speed dating session would be nice, especially to get the different generations into contact.

    Small focussed conferences help, then most people have similar interests, and you see each other more often, so that you can actually build up a relationship and not just talk once. They are harder to know of, but your supervisor should know them.

    Talk to people after their talk. After that you can also break into the group they are in.

    Put your photo on your poster. Then it is easier for them to talk to you, while you are free to network in the row of your own poster.

    There is no conference diner every evening because many scientists also want to network with their network. Build up such a network by jointly writing on papers (if in Europe try to join a COST Action), join twitter. (Your about page could include your name and email.)


  2. Pingback: Harsh truths and bad conferences (Part 3) – Poster sessions | Owl_Meat

  3. Pingback: Harsh truths and bad conferences: Honest views of a PhD student | Owl_Meat

  4. Pingback: Making the most of academic conferences | Weekademia

  5. It might be a wrong impression of a phd student that there is only once social event at the typical conference. My experience is: There are many, essentially every lunch and every dinner. But they are not publicly announced. Besides the speakers’ dinner (often enough) there are many occasions where people just go dining with their buddies. And yes, it can be tough to get into these circles. But it is worth trying. A good start is to stay close to somebody you know well enough and make sure you are ready when they leave (with their buddies), chances are they drag you along. In fact, it is these informal meetings that make many senior people attend conferences after all since most of the time, the information from the talks could be more easily obtained otherwise (e.g. by reading papers or watching conference videos at home).


  6. Pingback: Harsh truths and bad conferences (Part 4) – Value for money | Owl_Meat

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s